Puritan Women in Literature - Dumbing Women Down

Cotton Mather by Peter Pelham
Early American literature shows that Puritan women were bound within a tight community and refused the opportunity to develop themselves intellectually.
A survey of early American literature shows that for Puritan women in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the subservient role of wifely service amounted to just one of the functions of marriage. Even more significant for them was motherhood. In this society, women were not considered as intellectuals and were only educated in Calvinistic doctrines.

Puritan Women – Must Suffer Childbirth


In A History of Their Own: Women in Europe From Prehistory to the Present, Volume II, 1989, authors Bonnie Anderson and Judith Zinsser point out that Calvin believed women could not reach salvation by faith alone, but were required to suffer the act of childbirth and nurturing; the punishment that Eve deserved in order to reach such exaltation (260). However, throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, many women died or expected to die giving birth.
Puritan housewife and poet, Anne Bradstreet, whose father had taken care of her education in England, confirms this in her poem "Before the Birth of One of Her Children," published in The Norton Anthology of American Literature, 1995, with her lines,
"But with death's parting blow is sure to meet.
The sentence past is most irrevocable" (4-5,130).

Puritan Women Powerless and Unheard

 Thus by limiting them to housewifery and motherhood, the Puritan patriarchal society positioned women impotently within their realm. Anne Bradstreet alludes to women's status in her poem "The Prologue", also part of The Norton Anthology of American Literature:
"Men have precedency and still excel,
It is but vain unjustly to wage war;
Men can do best, and women know well –
Pre-eminence in all and each is yours;
Yet grant some small acknowledgement of ours" (37-41, 121).
Anne Bradstreet was an exception during this period since women were not encouraged to better themselves intellectually nor allowed to produce literary works. However, women’s powerlessness during this period is emphasised not only by the scarcity of women's literature, but also by the lack of merit given to them in male literature. In Nathaniel Hawthorne's short stories "My Kinsman, Major Molineux" and "The Minister's Black Veil" all part of The Norton Anthology of American Literature , his references to women are as "my sweet pretty mistress," "an old woman," "the most innocent girl," "a superstitious old woman," "the bride," and "good women gossiping"; there are no names only opprobrious descriptions.

Wikimedia commons public domain
A Fair Puritan - E. Percy Moran
The Puritan patriarchs conveniently placed their women into lives of domesticity and motherhood and failed to acknowledge their worth outside the home. Women were considered troublesome if they objected or tried to enlarge their roles beyond those specified by the Puritan community. Bradstreet depicts this in “The Prologue,” when she writes, “I am obnoxious to each carping tongue, Who says my hand a needle better fits” (24-25 121). Thus forced into domesticity by the patriarchs, women received little historical recognition; consequently; they found difficulty claiming a voice in their society and their mental and physical freedom became limited and their individual development restricted.
Women were allowed only to become literate through Bible study and the accepted belief was that only men were born with intelligence and understanding, shown in Bradstreet’s lines of "The Prologue", "If what I do prove well, it won’t advance, They'll say it’s stolen, or else it was by chance" (29-30, 121). Accordingly, women received limited reading materials; another method used in the Puritan community by the patriarchs to ensure that women remained in their designated roles.

Literary Freedom Causes Confusion

The fears of the patriarchal society that reading beyond that of the permitted scripts would advance female thinking are highlighted through the consequences of Anne Bradstreet's atypical educated background and unrestricted access to literature. Bradstreet's knowledge brought ambivalence and she became torn between God and her inner feelings for freedom. Unable to express her thoughts publicly within her community, she chose poetry as a means to express her discontent and unresolved conflict between her inner feelings and the doctrines of Puritanism.

Puritan Women Remained Unaccomplished

In order to justify her writing to the community and to endeavour to remain within the conventions of Puritanical thought, Bradstreet purposely diminished her self-worth as a poet and as a woman by using self-effacing apologies within her verses. For example, in her poem "The Author To Her Book" she claims her manuscript, surreptitiously published in London, England, in 1650, by her brother-in-law, to be an "ill-formed offspring of [her] feeble brain (1, 130)." Ironically, despite the restraints of her community, Anne Bradstreet was the first New World resident to have her works published.

Sources
  • Anderson B.S. and J.P. Zinsser. A History of Their Own: Women in Europe From Pre-History To The Present: Volume II. Harper Perennial, New York, 1989.
  • The Norton Anthology of American Literature. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. New York,1995.
  • Beard, C. and M. Beard. A Basic History of The United States. The New Home Library, New York,1944.
First published, Feb 23, 2011, by Lesley Lanir on Suite101.com
Copyright Lesley Lanir. Contact the author to obtain permission for republication.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Slang, Swearing and Death in The Catcher in the Rye

Image
Salinger's protagonist,  Holden Caulfield reveals his innermost thoughts through a stream of consciousness awash with slang, swearing, and references to death. Societal pressures intensely disturb the anti-hero of   The Catcher in the Rye , causing him to reject and pervert expected social conventions. Although Holden constantly engages himself in conversation, he equally explicitly demonstrates his dislike of dialogue and instead prefers to express himself through the medium of writing, a form of communication that creates a distance between himself and the reader but brings him closer to his older brother D.B., who is a writer. Holden Caulfield’s use of slang Through his writing, Holden discovers a vehicle for self-expression; however, the surface structure of his narration projects simple language, “lousy vocabulary” (8), and consistent vulgarities. Yet, with repeated occurrences of key words or groups of key words, a technique of this kind serves to symbol...
Read more

Peirce’s Triadic Model – Interpreting Signs

Image
A sign or  a symbol? Image by Lesley Lanir  When Ferdinand de Saussure was formulating his two part ‘dyadic’ model of the sign, consisting of a ‘signifier, or  the form that a sign takes, and the ‘signified,’ or concept  it represents, American, Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914) was theorizing his own model of semiotics and signs. In contrast to Saussure’s model, Peirce formulated a three-part triadic model consisting of an interpretant,  representamen, and an object. Symbols according to Peirce. Diagram Lesley Lanir By examining the relationship between objects, interpretants, and representamens and, in particular, the way the referent determines the sign, Peirce also distinguished three main ‘modes’  into which signs can be assigned: symbol, icon and index. Example of  an iconic sign. Image by Lesley Lanir Iconic signs according to Peirce. Diagram Lesley Lanir Example of an indexical sign. Image by Lesley Lanir I...
Read more

Interpreting signs – Charles Sanders Peirce

Image
We are surrounded by numerous types of signs and sign systems that we may not be fully aware of. How we interpret these signs and react to our understanding of them gives them meaning. Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914) formulated the innovative triadic model of the sign, emphasizing in his theory that the way we interpret a ‘sign’ is what allows it to be signified – what gives it its meaning. Therefore, when creating a sign system the main attributes of any sign need to be clear enough to relay their intended meaning, or else they will be valueless. What are signs? Peirce’s theory does not focus on just material or concrete signs, but any kind of sign. For example, if a bus driver announces that the next stop is Central Station and a passenger rings the bell, lighting up the ‘stop’ sign  – then the sign system here has been understood. The message contained  in the driver’s announcement is the sign that he will drive straight past that terminal if no one responds. H...
Read more